(All site written content is Copyright (C) 2013 by Hugh Hunt)
Would you fly on a plane with no pilot? As the first
passenger jet with no one at the controls travelled 500 miles over Britain,
admittedly on a test flight with no passengers on board, passengers on flights
in the future could apparently soon face a worrying dilemma, as for reasons
best known to themselves, the air
industry believes pilotless flying is the future of air travel. There I was
thinking that with all those unemployed disgruntled graduates out there looking
for a good job, not to mention even more who are unemployed but not up to their
neck in student loans, there should be a large pool of suitable trainee pilots around
to see the airlines through until they bring in Star Trek transporters to get
us all to Benidorm.
Generally speaking I’m not a scaredy-cat and have never had
any problem with flying, even in the rather casual maintenance environment of West
Africa, but if anyone thinks they’re going to get me up in a pilotless computer
controlled flying machine to anywhere they are completely out of their tiny
mind. With the world awash with computer hacking nerds, geeks and cyber nutters
on God knows what designer drugs, thinking what a laugh it would be to take
over the control of a plane full of expendable computer illiteratie and see if
they can land it, not to mention those well-known Muslim terrorists always
looking for a new way to kill innocent people, the air industry must be out of
their high flying minds.
![]() |
| OK Betty, you can send the 747 from New York into Biggin Hill now. What do you mean,it's not an airfield anymore? |
Some predict that within ten or 20 years, commercial jets
will be flown routinely by remote control over our towns and cities, but I have
a feeling that Joe Public along with every Health and Safety Inspector ever
hatched out into this dangerous world will have quite a lot to say about it,
and will more than likely tell “some” to piss off rather than have their flight flown by faceless controllers on the ground. Mysteriously, supporters of
so-called ‘autonomous aircraft’ justify
their developments on safety grounds, claiming that as most air accidents are
caused by human error, then surely it makes sense to remove people from the
equation. Obviously these staggeringly naïve individuals are forgetting the small
detail that only people fly aircraft at the moment, so apart from major mechanical
failure, which incidentally human pilots frequently overcome and land safely,
human error is about the only other choice. Have these innocent soul’s never
heard of computer failure, or do they live in some rarefied world where
computers are infallible machines which never let you down, because if they do,
have they got room for me there?
![]() |
| Is there a computer engineer on board? |
Last month’s test flight over the UK was part of the Astraea
project, which is the catchily named, £62 million Autonomous Systems Technology
Related Airborne Evaluation and Assessment programme funded by industry and the
Government. The craft, with the original nickname of the “Flying Test Bed”, is
able to cruise in British airspace with no human involvement, though not yet
without any humans on board, presumably in case the computer says “no” at an
awkward moment, or the controller on the ground needs to pop to the loo. The
high-definition cameras in the cockpit and underneath the craft scan the skies
for weather systems and other old fashioned manned flying machines, and feed
the information back to the computerised navigation system, allowing the craft
to change course automatically to avoid storms and turbulence, other aircraft,
weather balloons and even parachutes, parachutists will be glad to hear. The
only planes regularly flown pilotless thus far are those much debated “drones”,
of which there have been 100 crashes since 2007, including nine since the start
of this year, so obviously still work in progress.
![]() |
| God knows where the bloody things gone now. It's probably miles away and about to crash on some silly sod's head. |
Lambert Dopping-Hepenstal, Astraea Programme Director at BAE
Systems, whose name I incidentally can’t bring myself to take seriously, says “Unmanned
civil aircraft are an exciting new opportunity. We see these aircraft
undertaking dangerous roles in poor conditions”, so possibly they will just be
asking for volunteer passengers who are already flirting with the idea of
suicide rather than regular fair payers. He also claims that “unlike humans,
computers don’t get tired, don’t need lavatory breaks, don’t have unions and
don’t need regular rest periods (or get drunk at parties with stewardesses the
night before they fly),” ho! ho! More to the point Lambert Dopping-Hepenstal
also admits what is surely at the heart of all this; that it will save the
aircraft operating industry money, but strangely makes no mention of computers
being fallible and breaking down or cyber-attacks and the like. All in all, one of
the high tech developments I can quite happily do without seeing in operation
before I head off into oblivion.
The main pleasure from writing a blog is knowing that people enjoy
reading it.
If you enjoy my blog posts please copy the link to your friends -
www.hug-h.com
I
will appreciate any comments you have to make on my posts. Don't be put
off if it says "No Comments" below as it just means there are no
comments made yet, so just click there and comment away.



















